Friday, September 21, 2012

Why We Shouldn’t Accept “Fat Acceptance”

I'm on my way to Vegas today, so I'll leave you with this.  I didn't write it, but I definitely agree with it.

==============================

Why We Shouldn’t Accept “Fat Acceptance”


Some tidbits.  But the whole article, while long, is so very worth the read.

The very name of the “Fat Acceptance” movement is exemplary of what’s wrong with identity-politics rhetoric: it muddles dispassionate conceptual arguments with overtones of personal, emotional stuff.  In other words, if you say “I don’t support the Fat Acceptance movement,” and what you mean is “I believe obesity is not genetic and it’s possible for fat people to lose weight,” it’s going to be heard as “I think it’s okay to be mean to fat people.”  And this is by design: the aim of the movement’s rhetoric is to render scientific arguments culturally unstable, so that they instantly degenerate into arguments about personal prejudice.  As a general rule, you should stay away from movements that make a habit of this sort of thing.

 What more proof do you need that obesity isn’t wholly — or even predominantly — genetic than the fact that it’s happening in America?  America is, as you doubtless learned in elementary school, a “melting pot.”  People have been coming here from all over the world for as long as we’ve existed.  There’s no such thing as being genetically “American” — so how the hell could something genetic be happening in America and nowhere else?  And don’t tell me people in other countries are all malnourished.  I’m not comparing us to North Korea and sub-Saharan Africa here — I’m comparing us to Europe, where most Americans’ genes sailed over from within very recent history, and freaking Canada, which is right next door.  Why would people in Minnesota be genetically fat and people half an hour across the border not be?  If two-thirds of Americans of, say, Irish or French ancestry are “genetically” fat, then roughly the same proportions of people in Ireland or France should also be fat, but they’re not.  The only way wildly disproportionate obesity rates could be both genetic and uniquely American would be if aliens are altering our DNA by bombarding us with gamma rays or something — in which case, I should really not be writing this article, because I wouldn’t like two-thirds of Americans when they’re angry.

Yes, it is true that you need personal trainers and dietitians to look like Gwyneth Paltrow or the dude who plays Thor.  But you don’t need a personal trainer or a dietitian to look like a reasonably attractive regular person.  It’s not like there’s no middle ground between “celebrity” and “big fat pig.”  In fact, I’ll map out that middle ground right now.
    10:  A-List celebrity who is one of the most attractive people on the planet
      9:  Incredibly hot person whom most people would still give their right arm to date
      8:  Damn good-looking person who has no trouble getting dates or attention
      7:  Totally cute person anyone would marry assuming they are compatible in other ways
      6:  Marginally attractive person
      5:  Marginally unattractive person
      4:  Fat
      3:  So fat your coworkers make faces when they hear you eating
      2:  So fat you need one of those fat-person canes with the three prongs at the bottom
      1:  So fat there’s a reality show about how fat you are

If I let myself I'd sit here and quote the whole article, which does a disservice to the author, so just go read it, okay?

13 comments:

  1. I spent this entire post nodding my head and saying, "Yes... yes... exactly... yes." And now I'm going to click on that link and agree with the author some more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for sharing this article. Loveit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not reading that wall of text. You just hate fat people because you're sizist.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree! Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  5. My immediate thoughts: I would guess that the fat acceptance movement, if that exists, embraces things like banishing fat discrimination, and promoting happiness regardless of appearance. I don't think anyone really WANTS to be very overweight. But once you get that way, why not still love yourself.

    To the extent obesity is a big problem in America, I prioritize the problems in this country with how much they affect me personally, cause I'm selfish like that. Obesity affects me to the extent that it makes our health care system very expensive, and that's probably it. I also live in a part of the country where most people look like #6-10, so it's hard for me to think of this problem.

    I guess in short, I can't get rage-y about a fat person finding a reason to justify not being thinner. To each their own....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good article, thanks for sharing!

    No, it's more private now. I can't see your pic albums anymore. So that's good, right :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Okay so full disclosure, I didn't read the article. =) I will later.

    1. I don't think the fat acceptance movement is all about disproving that obesity is genetic. I consider myself part of the fat acceptance movement and what that means to me is simply that just because someone is obese, doesn't mean they are lazy/a bad person/less worthy of acceptance than I am. I think there are many subgroups of the fat acceptance movement/initiative, just like not all Democrats are the same.

    2. Obesity may not be genetic, but I think most fat children are fat because of their parents. I know data is not the plural of anecdote, but I was brought up in a household wherein we ate 1,000+ calorie snacks three times a day, where we ate almost exclusively carbs (seriously - I never ate chicken before high school!), where we drank full-sugar Coke instead of water. So of course I was 140lb (at less than 5') by the time I was 13. And once you've been that overweight, it's hard to maintain at a lower weight...which is not an excuse, but I think it should be a consideration when we're judging others.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Agreed...though I think most the world sits in the marginally attractive person category!

    ReplyDelete
  9. That was a super interesting read. Thank you for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I liked the written out scale. I think I'm a 9, is that right? At least a 7...right?

    All kidding aside, it's a tough issue. I read the article. Good points are made. The point of, don't let your kids get fat because science shows one you've been fat it's harder to not be fat, is such a good one. We shouldn't judge others for being overweight OR underweight OR whatever, but it doesn't mean that being unhealthy should be accepted.

    Then again, I don't think anyone should love or hate themselves based on their size.



    ReplyDelete
  11. Too long, didn't read. Reading that much is for fatties.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree with all of this. Thank you for writing this.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you *to the original author*, I mean. Thank YOU for sharing.

    ReplyDelete